Printed Circuit Board Assembly & PCB Design SMT Electronics Assembly Manufacturing Forum

Printed Circuit Board Assembly & PCB Design Forum

SMT electronics assembly manufacturing forum.


Re: roll type of cleaning wiper

In-Tec

#11900

roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr

reply »

In-Tec

#11901

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr |

reply »

#11902

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | Idiot: I wouldn't visit your site if I had to start using toilet paper. Keep your trash off the forum. This is a site for production professionals. If you want to promote your products, buy a banner, you cheap louse. In fact you're a double louse for posting this pathetic message so many times. Dave F

reply »

Ben Kirk

#11903

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | Its Dumb stunts like this that is running this site for everyone. Spend a few dollars and buy the space you need. Or wait till someone actually want's to know about a roll around toilet paper dispenser.

B.K.

reply »

Steve Gregory

#11904

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| | Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | | | Idiot: I wouldn't visit your site if I had to start using toilet paper. Keep your trash off the forum. This is a site for production professionals. If you want to promote your products, buy a banner, you cheap louse. In fact you're a double louse for posting this pathetic message so many times. Dave F

Dave,

You took the words right outta my mouth. See Cunli? This is the kind of crap that I ranted about in my responses to Earl's message below. You would have never seen this type of post on the TechNet from a vendor there...

And "Squeegee dude", I've worked with many different printers MPM, DEK, Cuger, FUJI, SMT Tek, HTI, etc. and I've never seen a "roll-type" of cleaner work good. They may be okay for 50-mil pitch apertures, but don't do crap on anything less than that.

I've also had serious problems with them in a memory company I worked at in the past from them doing nothing but smearing the paste on the bottom of the stencil so that they deposit solder on the gold fingers of the next few boards coming in to be printed after a cleaning cycle, giving me hundreds of SIMM's that needed gold finger rework after assembly. Took me weeks to figure that problem out back then. I can't imagine that you have come up with a better solution than any of the major printer companies that I listed have...

-Steve Gregory-

reply »

J.H.

#11905

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | I HAD TO VISIT YOUR SITE TO SEE WHY YOU COULD POSSIBLY THINK THAT IT WAS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO IMMORALLY POST IT ON THIS FORUM!! I HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING SO STUPID. DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT, WITH THE AMOUNT OF KNOWLEDGE THERE IS ON THIS FORUM,ANYTHING YOU HAVE ON YOUR SITE IS WORTH A DAMN!! I AM NOT SURE WHO WOULD USE YOUR SITE, BUT I DOUBT THAT ANYBODY FROM THIS FORUM HAS OR EVER WILL.

J.H.

reply »

#11906

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| | | Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | | | | | Idiot: I wouldn't visit your site if I had to start using toilet paper. Keep your trash off the forum. This is a site for production professionals. If you want to promote your products, buy a banner, you cheap louse. In fact you're a double louse for posting this pathetic message so many times. Dave F | | Dave, | | You took the words right outta my mouth. See Cunli? This is the kind of crap that I ranted about in my responses to Earl's message below. You would have never seen this type of post on the TechNet from a vendor there... | | And "Squeegee dude", I've worked with many different printers MPM, DEK, Cuger, FUJI, SMT Tek, HTI, etc. and I've never seen a "roll-type" of cleaner work good. They may be okay for 50-mil pitch apertures, but don't do crap on anything less than that. | | I've also had serious problems with them in a memory company I worked at in the past from them doing nothing but smearing the paste on the bottom of the stencil so that they deposit solder on the gold fingers of the next few boards coming in to be printed after a cleaning cycle, giving me hundreds of SIMM's that needed gold finger rework after assembly. Took me weeks to figure that problem out back then. I can't imagine that you have come up with a better solution than any of the major printer companies that I listed have... | | -Steve Gregory- | |

reply »

#11907

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 18 April, 1999

| | | | Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | | | | | | | Idiot: I wouldn't visit your site if I had to start using toilet paper. Keep your trash off the forum. This is a site for production professionals. If you want to promote your products, buy a banner, you cheap louse. In fact you're a double louse for posting this pathetic message so many times. Dave F | | | | Dave, | | | | You took the words right outta my mouth. See Cunli? This is the kind of crap that I ranted about in my responses to Earl's message below. You would have never seen this type of post on the TechNet from a vendor there... | | | | And "Squeegee dude", I've worked with many different printers MPM, DEK, Cuger, FUJI, SMT Tek, HTI, etc. and I've never seen a "roll-type" of cleaner work good. They may be okay for 50-mil pitch apertures, but don't do crap on anything less than that. | | | | I've also had serious problems with them in a memory company I worked at in the past from them doing nothing but smearing the paste on the bottom of the stencil so that they deposit solder on the gold fingers of the next few boards coming in to be printed after a cleaning cycle, giving me hundreds of SIMM's that needed gold finger rework after assembly. Took me weeks to figure that problem out back then. I can't imagine that you have come up with a better solution than any of the major printer companies that I listed have... | | | | -Steve Gregory- | |

STEVE DAVE BEN JH

THANKS FOR GETTING HIM GUYS, AS IF WE NEED THAT JUNK ON THE FORUM.. AND I AM A SALES GUY, BUT HEAR TO LEARN.

I surprised Justin didn't get them / it / whatever the group is. Wayne

reply »

Scott Davies

#11908

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 19 April, 1999

| | Please visit our Web site, especially 'link page', to get some hint for roll typr of cleaning wiper for automatic screen printers. http://www.squeegee.co.kr | |

If the brainless idiot that keeps posting this message on the forum bothers to read any of the replies to it, please take note of the following, originally posted by Cunli on March 25th:

----------------------------------------------------------------- This morning we had to delete two messages that promoted company products and services on this TECHNICAL Forum. Although these messages are useful information, they are in violation of our Forum rule that prohibits unsolicited advertising through a posting. We encourage all companies to register with SMTnet so that your products and services are easily found through our Directory Database. We also recommend that companies try out banner advertising on the SMTnet site. Please e-mail me or call me at 207-780-0887 if you are serious about reaching our 15,000-20,000 monthly visitors. Thank you.

Cunli Jia Director of Product Development SMTnet -----------------------------------------------------------------

This is a great forum; I, along with many others, want to see it stay that way. This kind of garbage has no place here. Do us all a favour, In-Tec (whoever you are), and go away now.

Scott

reply »

#11909

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 19 April, 1999

You clearly violated the "No Advertising" rule, although you may have been unaware of this when posting your message. We regret that we did not have a chance to delete it before it generated so many responses. In order to prevent such incidents from happening again, we are in the process of designing a more effective way of communicating the rules of the SMTnet community.

Cunli

reply »

#11910

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 19 April, 1999

| You clearly violated the "No Advertising" rule, although you may have been unaware of this when posting your message. We regret that we did not have a chance to delete it before it generated so many responses. In order to prevent such incidents from happening again, we are in the process of designing a more effective way of communicating the rules of the SMTnet community. | | Cunli | Cunli: If this offender received and read the message that you listed in "Re: roll type of cleaning wiper - Scott Davies 03:53:17 04/19/1999," then I'm uncertain how one could be more clear. I wonder if some remedial action may be required? TTYL Dave F

reply »

#11911

Thanks, Scott | 19 April, 1999

Thank you for pasting my earlier posting here. Cunli

reply »

#11912

Re: roll type of cleaning wiper | 19 April, 1999

| Cunli: If this offender received and read the message that you listed in "Re: roll type of cleaning wiper - Scott Davies 03:53:17 04/19/1999," then I'm uncertain how one could be more clear. I wonder if some remedial action may be required? TTYL Dave F |

Dave,

I am willing to give him/her the benefit of doubt. Therefore I don't think In Tech should pay more than with the negative publicity. We never emailed out the posting that Scott pasted below. In addition, people using English as a second language do tend to miss things, as I do.

Thanks,

Cunli

reply »

Comprehensive Analytical Services and Support

Comprehensive Analytical Services and Support