INDIUM 92J solder paste feedback

Subscribe to Thread

Does anyone have any feedback on how INDIUM 92J performs? W... - May 08, 2005 by

We have used this paste for about 6 months. It performs very... - May 09, 2005 by Sr. Tech

We used the 92J a couple of years ago for a while. It perfor... - May 09, 2005 by

We've been using 92J now in an automotive environment for 3 ... - May 13, 2005 by

Rick Iodice

#34132

INDIUM 92J solder paste feedback | 8 May, 2005

Does anyone have any feedback on how INDIUM 92J performs? What is good? What is bad?

reply »

Sr. Tech

#34141

INDIUM 92J solder paste feedback | 9 May, 2005

We have used this paste for about 6 months. It performs very well in a variety of conditions.

FYI: Before the 92J we used 92 for about 6 years or so. The 92J is definitely better.

reply »

jdumont

#34152

INDIUM 92J solder paste feedback | 9 May, 2005

We used the 92J a couple of years ago for a while. It performed very well for us. However when we started batch cleaning our assemblies the 92J post solder residue was not very easy to remove so we switched to Kester 256 which cleaned better.

reply »

Dasume

#34233

INDIUM 92J solder paste feedback | 13 May, 2005

We've been using 92J now in an automotive environment for 3 years now, one thing that attracted us to it was its ability to take a abuse and a kicking. no matter how your operators mistreat it, it still prints well.

you may want to look into 92H, the only drawback on 92J is the flux residue is still tacky after reflow and could atract contamination, the 92H leaves the reflow with a hard un-tacky residue.

reply »