| | | We have experienced poor adhesion of acrylic conformal coating to plastic bodied IC�s. The observed symptoms of this are a blistering or lifting of the coating at the surface of the component, although peel testing has revealed that this is not always present. | | | At this time it is believed that this poor adhesion may be a result of mold release, however several other factors, including excess thermal | | | | | stressing of the coating, and inadequate coating cure, are being investigated. | | | Of these, the largest body of evidence points to mold release. An X-ray spectroscopic analysis of the surface of the components in question has revealed the presence of elemental silicon. This silicon may be present in either a silicone or glass silica form. Discussions with the component vendor has revealed the presence of a wax based mold release in the plastic. A thorough ultra-sonic cleaning of the component with freon left a hydrocarbon residue in the freon as revealed by FTIR. | | | Has anyone else experienced similar coating problems? Are there any solutions to problems of this nature? Currently we are investigating the use of a primer for improved adhesion, changing the type of coating used (urethane is the only other option), and cleaning the components. Has anyone had any experience with these processes? | | | Also, are there any other companies which are successfully coating plastic components with acrylic or urethane conformal coating? | | | Thank you, | | | Chris Fontaine | | | Manufacturing Engineer, Circuit Card Assembly, | | | Sanders, a Lockheed Martin Company | | Chris, | | You have done all the right things analytical. Acrylic, with or without contamination, as you know in your discipline, is very thermal sensitive. It is also very contaminate sensitive under thermal stress (cold flows). In all cases, the right environment has to be assured for it to adhere as specified. This means minimum contamination as grease, dirt, silicone, moisture, or? Then, thermal conditions must be right when everything else is. | | Earl Moon | Earl, | Thank you for your response to my question. From your post it is my understanding that the adhesion of acrylic conformal coat under thermal stress is contaminant sensitive, however I am unclear as to how cold flow factors in to this. Could you please clarify the relationship to cold flow phenomena and adhesion under thermal stress? | Thank you again, | Chris Fontaine Chris, First, acrylic "moves" (cold flows) over any surface, or not, be it fluid or solid. It does not bond to anything readily, if at all. If contaminates of any type are under its placement, it further resists "bonding" and "delaminates" or does not adequately "bond." Please understand, as I know you must, at your level of technical expertise and with your history of process capabilities, acrylic is both thermal (not so much pressure sensitive) and contaminate sensitive. It neither likes to bond to anything (period) and, especially does not like to "bond" when contamination found under its application. You folks (Sanders - must have a huge history) have known this for years in flex and rigid/flex designs. You were one of the pioneers we all look to for this type information. Earl Moon
reply »